[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a85n1c5h.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 09:00:42 +0800
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...el.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 05/13] block, THP: Make block_device_operations.rw_page support THP
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 02:46:27PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
>>
>> The .rw_page in struct block_device_operations is used by the swap
>> subsystem to read/write the page contents from/into the corresponding
>> swap slot in the swap device. To support the THP (Transparent Huge
>> Page) swap optimization, the .rw_page is enhanced to support to
>> read/write THP if possible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...el.com>
>> Cc: Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
>> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
>> Cc: linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
>> ---
>> drivers/block/brd.c | 6 +++++-
>> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 ++
>> drivers/nvdimm/btt.c | 4 +++-
>> drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> The changes in brd.c, zram_drv.c and pmem.c look good to me. For those bits
> you can add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks!
> I think we still want Vishal to make sure that the BTT changes are okay. I
> don't know that code well enough to know whether it's safe to throw 512 pages
> at btt_[read|write]_pg().
>
> Also, Ying, next time can you please CC me (and probably the linux-nvdimm
> list) on the whole series? It would give us more context on what the larger
> change is, allow us to see the cover letter, allow us to test with all the
> patches in the series, etc. It's pretty easy for reviewers to skip over the
> patches we don't care about or aren't in our area.
Sure.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> Thanks,
> - Ross
Powered by blists - more mailing lists