linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] nvme: introduce NVMe Namespace Identification Descriptor structures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170605053300.GC19480@lst.de>
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2017 07:33:00 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc:     Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, maxg@...lanox.com,
        Linux NVMe Mailinglist <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] nvme: introduce NVMe Namespace Identification
        Descriptor structures

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 05:59:06PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>   +struct nvme_ns_identifier_hdr {
>> +	__u8 nidt;
>> +	__u8 nidl;
>> +	__le16 reserved;
>> +};
>
> Nit: _hdr is usually associated with a message or alike.
>
> Maybe nvme_ns_id_desc is more consistent with the spec language.

The descriptor itself includes the actual value, that's why
I suggested adding the _hdr prefix.  But I'm fine going either way.