[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170605.145523.2161559093801012337.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 14:55:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mike.kravetz@...cle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
nitin.m.gupta@...cle.com, bob.picco@...cle.com,
anthony.yznaga@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc64: mm: fix copy_tsb to correctly copy huge page
TSBs
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:51:12 -0700
> When a TSB grows beyond its current capacity, a new TSB is allocated
> and copy_tsb is called to copy entries from the old TSB to the new.
> A hash shift based on page size is used to calculate the index of an
> entry in the TSB. copy_tsb has hard coded PAGE_SHIFT in these
> calculations. However, for huge page TSBs the value REAL_HPAGE_SHIFT
> should be used. As a result, when copy_tsb is called for a huge page
> TSB the entries are placed at the incorrect index in the newly
> allocated TSB. When doing hardware table walk, the MMU does not
> match these entries and we end up in the TSB miss handling code.
> This code will then create and write an entry to the correct index
> in the TSB. We take a performance hit for the table walk miss and
> recreation of these entries.
>
> Pass a new parameter to copy_tsb that is the page size shift to be
> used when copying the TSB.
>
> Suggested-by: Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Great find, applied and queued up for -stable.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists