linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/53] 4.4.71-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:19:52 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/53] 4.4.71-stable review

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 03:07:26PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 06:16:58PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.71 release.
> > There are 53 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed Jun  7 15:30:23 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 145 pass: 143 fail: 2
> Failed builds:
> 	s390:defconfig
> 	s390:allmodconfig
> 
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 115 pass: 114 fail: 1
> Failed tests:
> 	s390:defconfig
> 
> Common error:
> 
> Building s390:defconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c: In function 'adjust_slots_upwards.isra.59':
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8239:18: warning: array subscript is below array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8240:17: warning: array subscript is below array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c: In function 'qeth_l3_probe_device':
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3235:2: error: 'struct qeth_card' has no member named 'ip_htable'
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3235:2: error: 'struct qeth_card' has no member named 'ip_htable'
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3235:2: error: 'struct qeth_card' has no member named 'ip_htable'
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3235:2: error: 'struct qeth_card' has no member named 'ip_htable'
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3235:2: error: 'struct qeth_card' has no member named 'ip_htable'
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3235:2: error: negative width in bit-field '<anonymous>'
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3236:2: error: 'struct qeth_card' has no member named 'ip_mc_htable'
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3236:2: error: 'struct qeth_card' has no member named 'ip_mc_htable'
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3236:2: error: 'struct qeth_card' has no member named 'ip_mc_htable'
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3236:2: error: 'struct qeth_card' has no member named 'ip_mc_htable'
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3236:2: error: 'struct qeth_card' has no member named 'ip_mc_htable'
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c:3236:2: error: negative width in bit-field '<anonymous>'
> make[3]: *** [drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.o] Error 1

Thanks, 0-day just reported the same thing, I backported a s390 patch
too far backwards in time.  I've now dropped it so this should be all
good.

thanks for the testing.

greg k-h