linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: sprd: Add Spreadtrum pin control driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170606074023.GB11506@spreadtrum.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:40:24 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...eadtrum.com>
To:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, <kbuild-all@...org>,
        <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <broonie@...nel.org>, <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: sprd: Add Spreadtrum pin control driver

Hi,

O 二,  6月 06, 2017 at 03:20:55下午 +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> O 二,  6月 06, 2017 at 03:07:22上午 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Baolin,
> > 
> > [auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
> > [also build test WARNING on v4.12-rc4]
> > [cannot apply to pinctrl/devel next-20170605]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
> > 
> > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Baolin-Wang/DT-pinctrl-Add-binding-documentation-for-Spreadtrum-pin-controller/20170605-222351
> > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
> > config: i386-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> > compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
> > reproduce:
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         make ARCH=i386 
> > 
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > 
> >    drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c: In function 'sprd_pinconf_set':
> > >> drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:484:4: warning: case value '129' not in enumerated type 'enum pin_config_param' [-Wswitch]
> >        case SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_SLEEP_MODE:
> >        ^~~~
> >    drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:497:4: warning: case value '131' not in enumerated type 'enum pin_config_param' [-Wswitch]
> >        case SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SLEEP:
> >        ^~~~
> >    drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:502:4: warning: case value '132' not in enumerated type 'enum pin_config_param' [-Wswitch]
> >        case SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT_SLEEP:
> >        ^~~~
> >    drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:534:4: warning: case value '130' not in enumerated type 'enum pin_config_param' [-Wswitch]
> >        case SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_PULLUP:
> >        ^~~~
> >    drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:543:4: warning: case value '133' not in enumerated type 'enum pin_config_param' [-Wswitch]
> >        case SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_PULLUP_SLEEP:
> >        ^~~~
> >    drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:548:4: warning: case value '134' not in enumerated type 'enum pin_config_param' [-Wswitch]
> >        case SPRD_PIN_CONFIG_PULLDOWN_SLEEP:
> >        ^~~~
> 
> From kernel doc for 'enum pin_config_param', user need use
> PIN_CONFIG_END + 1 as the base offset if the user need to
> pass in custom configuration to the pin controller. So I do
> not think I need to fix this warning. Thanks.

Sorry for misunderstanding the warning, I've found the reason
of the warning and I will fix it in next version. Thanks.

> 
> > ---
> > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
> > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
> 
>