[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 11:58:49 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI / bus: Switch to use new generic UUID API
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 10:37:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 18:03 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> > + in_params[0].buffer.pointer = (u8 *)&guid;
> >>
> >> Any idea why the pointer is defined as a u8 * in union acpi_object
> >> instead of a void?
> >
> > I guess this question to Rafael.
>
> That data type is defined in upstream ACPICA and the reason why it is
> defined the way it is has something to do with history I suppose.
Ok, I'll send a patch to fix it - just about every user of the field
currently requires a cast, which is not a good thing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists