linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v4 10/10] staging: fsl-mc: move bus driver out of staging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:23:05 +0000
From:   Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "stuyoder@...il.com" <stuyoder@...il.com>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "agraf@...e.de" <agraf@...e.de>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>,
        Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@....com>,
        Catalin Horghidan <catalin.horghidan@....com>,
        "Leo Li" <leoyang.li@....com>, Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 10/10] staging: fsl-mc: move bus driver out of staging



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 5:20 PM
> To: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
> 
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:03:44PM +0000, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> > > Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2017 11:40 AM
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:58:52PM +0300, laurentiu.tudor@....com
> wrote:
> > > > From: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>
> > >
> > > Your subject says 'v4' yet the other patches here in the series do
> > > not, they say nothing, or 'v2', and the 0/10 patch says 'v6'!
> >
> > I'm tracking the patch versions individually and use the cover letter
> > version (v6 currently) to reflect the version of the patch series as a
> > whole. There are a bunch of patches that are either newly introduced in this
> series or didn't had multiple versions so I didn't tagged them with a version tag.
> > The patch [10/10] didn't changed since v4 so I left the version
> > unchanged. The only change was in patch [07/10] for which I added a commit
> message so I bumped the version to v2.
> 
> And that's totally crazy.  What do you expect me, or anyone else, to know what
> to do with that.  Heck, I can't even sort them by proper order in which to apply
> them in, if I wanted to.  You are keeping me from actually using your work :(
> 
> > > Please fix up and do this correctly.  The _whole_ patch series is
> > > versioned, otherwise how can I sort them to apply them in the correct order?
> >
> > Want me to tag all the patches with the same version (that is, v7 for
> > the next respin)?
> 
> Yes, like everyone else does please :)
> 

Ok, finally got it. :-) Will do so in the next spin.

---
Thanks & Best Regards, Laurentiu