lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:54:28 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:53:57AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > So the only part of this patch that is needed is the changes to the > comments, right? ;-) Right, although I would suggest putting that requirement (the balanced lock vs unlock) somewhere as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists