[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 08:59:47 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU
from both process and interrupt context
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:53:57AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > So the only part of this patch that is needed is the changes to the
> > comments, right? ;-)
>
> Right, although I would suggest putting that requirement (the balanced
> lock vs unlock) somewhere as well.
Good point! Otherwise, some one will decide it is a good idea to
try sooner or later.
Thnax, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists