[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:28:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathias Koehrer <mathias.koehrer@...s.com>,
David Hauck <davidh@...acquire.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT V2] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious
lock wakeup
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:20:37PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2210,7 +2210,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wake_up_process);
> */
> int wake_up_lock_sleeper(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_ALL, WF_LOCK_SLEEPER);
> + return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, WF_LOCK_SLEEPER);
> }
>
> int wake_up_state(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state)
Do we want this?
---
Subject: sched: Remove TASK_ALL
It's unused:
$ git grep "\<TASK_ALL\>" | wc -l
1
And dangerous, kill the bugger.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 3dfa5f99d6ee..e88aadbe2071 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct task_group;
/* Convenience macros for the sake of wake_up(): */
#define TASK_NORMAL (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE | TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
-#define TASK_ALL (TASK_NORMAL | __TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED)
/* get_task_state(): */
#define TASK_REPORT (TASK_RUNNING | TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE | \
Powered by blists - more mailing lists