[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6255d34e-499d-db38-ec86-8930828684de@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:03:28 -0700
From: jane.chu@...cle.com
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, atish.patra@...cle.com,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "JANE.CHU" <jane.chu@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch/sparc: support NR_CPUS = 4096
On 06/05/2017 05:57 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 16:48:31 -0600
>
>> Linux SPARC64 limits NR_CPUS to 4064 because init_cpu_send_mondo_info()
>> only allocates a single page for NR_CPUS mondo entries. Thus we cannot
>> use all 4096 CPUs on some SPARC platforms.
>>
>> To fix, allocate (2^order) pages where order is set according to the size
>> of cpu_list for possible cpus. Since cpu_list_pa and cpu_mondo_block_pa
>> are not used in asm code, there are no imm13 offsets from the base PA
>> that will break because they can only reach one page.
>>
>> Orabug: 25505750
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
>> index 58243b0..4399be7 100644
>> --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
>> @@ -192,9 +192,9 @@ config NR_CPUS
>> int "Maximum number of CPUs"
>> depends on SMP
>> range 2 32 if SPARC32
>> - range 2 1024 if SPARC64
>> + range 2 4096 if SPARC64
>> default 32 if SPARC32
>> - default 64 if SPARC64
>> + default 4096 if SPARC64
>>
>> source kernel/Kconfig.hz
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c
>> index 4d0248a..cc8f6c3 100644
>> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c
>> @@ -1034,17 +1034,25 @@ static void __init init_cpu_send_mondo_info(struct trap_per_cpu *tb)
>> {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> unsigned long page;
>> + void *mondo;
>>
>> - BUILD_BUG_ON((NR_CPUS * sizeof(u16)) > (PAGE_SIZE - 64));
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON((NR_CPUS * sizeof(u16)) > PAGE_SIZE);
>> +
>> + /* Make sure mondo block is 64byte aligned */
>> + mondo = kzalloc(64, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!mondo) {
>> + prom_printf("SUN4V: Error, cannot allocate mondo block.\n");
>> + prom_halt();
>> + }
>> + tb->cpu_mondo_block_pa = __pa(mondo);
> Hmmm, you said that this has to be 64 byte aligned right? We might have
> to do something in order to insure that, as kmalloc() only guarantees
> ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN which I think is 8 on sparc.
Yes.
>
> I suppose this would work:
>
> mondo = kzalloc(64 + 63, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> and then 64-byte align that pointer.
On sun4v sparc, it looks like kzalloc(64, GFP_KERNEL) ends up allocating
from kmalloc_caches[6] - a 64-byte kmem-cache allocated by
kmem_cache_init() with SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN flag set, so it's in
l3-cache-line-size
alignment, i.e. 64byte. I printed out the 'mondo' pa and verified that.
thanks!
-jane
Powered by blists - more mailing lists