[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASGzmF_WctWVJRQN_Ko7aOeXbwh6KHujKw1J-LAhvGQ2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:45:03 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Add SPDX license tag check for dts files
and headers
Hi Rob,
2017-02-24 0:56 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>:
> Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license of
> .dts{i} and DT header files rather than using free form license text. This
> check looks for GPL, BSD, or X11(really incorrectly labeled MIT license)
> license text which are the commonly used DT licenses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
I have a question.
Is SPDX encouraged only for DT?
What should we do with C source files?
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists