lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:23:20 +0800
From:   "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "Will Deacon" <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        chenchunxiao <chenchunxiao@...wei.com>, x86l <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: [Question or BUG] [NUMA]: I feel puzzled at the function
 cpumask_of_node

When I executed numactl -H(print cpumask_of_node for each node), I got different result on X86 and ARM64.
For each numa node, the former only displayed online CPUs, and the latter displayed all possible CPUs.
Actually, all other ARCHs is the same to ARM64.

So, my question is: Which case(online or possible) should function cpumask_of_node be? Or there is no matter about it?

-- 
Thanks!
BestRegards

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ