lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 18:00:52 +0800 From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io> To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> CC: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] drm: sun4i: add support for H3's TCON0/1 于 2017年6月7日 GMT+08:00 下午5:43:43, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> 写到: >On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 03:03:47AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >> >You should also expand function sun4i_drv_node_is_tcon() at >sun4i_drv.c >> >with >> >new entries, but I'm not sure if this fits in this patch. >> >> Instead I think it should be renamed to something like >> "sun4i_drv_node_is_tcon_with_ch0". > >I'm not sure, or at least, it shouldn't make any difference, since >TCON without a channel 0 will not have an endpoint 0, so this will be >dealt with already. But that will prevent new coders from add CH1-less TCON compatibles to this function. > >Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists