linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 07/23] mtd: nand: denali: do not propagate NAND_STATUS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1496836352-8016-8-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Date:   Wed,  7 Jun 2017 20:52:16 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Enrico Jorns <ejo@...gutronix.de>,
        Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong@...el.com>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/23] mtd: nand: denali: do not propagate NAND_STATUS_FAIL to waitfunc()

Currently, the error handling of denali_write_page(_raw) is a bit
complicated.  If the program command fails, NAND_STATUS_FAIL is set
to the driver internal denali->status, then read out later by
denali_waitfunc().

We can avoid it by exploiting the nand_write_page() implementation.
If chip->ecc.write_page(_raw) returns negative code (i.e. -EIO), it
errors out immediately.  This gives the same result as returning
NAND_STATUS_FAIL from chip->waitfunc.  In either way, -EIO is
returned to the upper MTD layer.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
---

Changes in v5: None
Changes in v4: None
Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2:
  - Newly added

 drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c | 12 ++++--------
 drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
index 1897fe238290..22acfc34b546 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
@@ -1005,6 +1005,7 @@ static int write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
 	size_t size = mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize;
 	uint32_t irq_status;
 	uint32_t irq_mask = INTR__DMA_CMD_COMP | INTR__PROGRAM_FAIL;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	denali->page = page;
 
@@ -1038,13 +1039,13 @@ static int write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
 	if (irq_status == 0) {
 		dev_err(denali->dev, "timeout on write_page (type = %d)\n",
 			raw_xfer);
-		denali->status = NAND_STATUS_FAIL;
+		ret = -EIO;
 	}
 
 	denali_enable_dma(denali, false);
 	dma_sync_single_for_cpu(denali->dev, addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /* NAND core entry points */
@@ -1196,12 +1197,7 @@ static void denali_select_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, int chip)
 
 static int denali_waitfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip)
 {
-	struct denali_nand_info *denali = mtd_to_denali(mtd);
-	int status = denali->status;
-
-	denali->status = 0;
-
-	return status;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int denali_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, int page)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h
index a06ed741b550..352d8328b94a 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h
@@ -323,7 +323,6 @@ struct nand_buf {
 struct denali_nand_info {
 	struct nand_chip nand;
 	int flash_bank; /* currently selected chip */
-	int status;
 	int platform;
 	struct nand_buf buf;
 	struct device *dev;
-- 
2.7.4