[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170607141957.akonr7hmuwpt7hlt@flea.lan>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 16:19:57 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
Cc: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] drm: sun4i: add support for H3's TCON0/1
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 于 2017年6月7日 GMT+08:00 下午5:43:43, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> 写到:
> >On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 03:03:47AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> >You should also expand function sun4i_drv_node_is_tcon() at
> >sun4i_drv.c
> >> >with
> >> >new entries, but I'm not sure if this fits in this patch.
> >>
> >> Instead I think it should be renamed to something like
> >> "sun4i_drv_node_is_tcon_with_ch0".
> >
> >I'm not sure, or at least, it shouldn't make any difference, since
> >TCON without a channel 0 will not have an endpoint 0, so this will be
> >dealt with already.
>
> But that will prevent new coders from add CH1-less TCON
> compatibles to this function.
Why? We already have such TCONs (like the A33's, or V3S') in that
function.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists