[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170607152615.2072-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 16:26:15 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-max8925: remove redundant check on ret
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The check on ret < 0 is redundant as the goto destination is the
next statment. Remove this redudant check and goto.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1268785 ("Identical code for different
branches")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-max8925.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max8925.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max8925.c
index 16d129a0bb3b..67d6fc2d23e6 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max8925.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max8925.c
@@ -234,8 +234,6 @@ static int max8925_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
ret = max8925_reg_write(info->rtc, MAX8925_ALARM0_CNTL, 0x77);
else
ret = max8925_reg_write(info->rtc, MAX8925_ALARM0_CNTL, 0x0);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
out:
return ret;
}
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists