linux-kernel - Re: Two regressions in 4.12-rc on Baytrail/T: #1 Pinctrol or WMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170607153842.GN3187@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Jun 2017 18:38:42 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Alan Cox <alan@...yncelyn.cymru>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Two regressions in 4.12-rc on Baytrail/T: #1 Pinctrol or WMI

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 04:20:44PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> ASUS T100TA, BIOS 3.07, machine version is the variant with the windows
> logo on the frame and no Energy Star logo.
> 
> The first one is in the pin controller (or I guess WMI) which now spews
> the (non fatal)
> 
> [   22.491352] Potential Error: Setting GPIO with direct_irq_en to output

Yeah, this sounds like a bug in the BIOS. The direct_irq_en is set which
means that the GPIO is routed directly to the IO-APIC (and is expected
to be input) but the device in question (WMI?) probably has some ACPI
method that uses the GPIO via ACPI Operation Region as output.