linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170607154206.3mcozi3fmue3dsuw@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 7 Jun 2017 16:42:06 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc:     LINUX-KERNEL <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        DEVICETREE <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        LINUX-INPUT <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        LINUX-PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LINUX-WATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator
 driver

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:09:56PM +0000, Steve Twiss wrote:
> On 07 June 2017 10:42, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'm missing the other patches in this series and the cover letter, what
> > are the dependencies here?

> My apologies Mark. I didn't re-send the cover letter because this regulator
> patch is the last one and I assumed it would not add anything.
> Am I confusing you here by not renaming the patch and leaving its subject
> as [PATCH V7 5/7]?

Yes, you are confusing things.  You're missing the point of numbering
patches in a series, it's so that when working with a set of patches
that have been posted pople know what order to apply them in.  The
numbering only means anything in a given posting of the series, if
something is resent it doesn't matter if it was posted before the
numbering should reflect what's being posted at the current time.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)