[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34e359b7-1a0b-3954-a3df-0d92a2e5814d@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 21:54:44 +0200
From: Bernhard Held <berny156@....de>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] X86: don't report PAT on CPUs that don't support it
On 06/07/2017 at 12:49 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here I send the second version of the patch. It drops the change from
> boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT) to this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT) (that
> caused kernel to be unbootable for some people).
>
> Another change is that setup_arch() calls init_cache_modes() if PAT is
> disabled, so that init_cache_modes() is always called.
>
> Mikulas
[PATCH v2] Works for me!
CHeers,
Bernhard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists