[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170607210057.GA29962@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 14:07:02 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Kamil Debski <kamil@...as.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hwmon: pwm-fan: switch to new atomic PWM API
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 03:38:44PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Friday, June 02, 2017 06:23:53 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 03:13:17PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > Switch pwm-fan driver to new atomic PWM API.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> > > ---
> > > Depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support"
> > > patchset (https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2495209.html).
> >
> > I lost track where we are with this patch. The above series set did not make
> > it, as far as I can see. Is this patch truly dependent on that series, or
> > can it be applied separately ? It does apply cleanly.
>
> I think that it can be applied separately (the broken suspend/resume code
> will continue to use the old API until the previous patchset is finally
> merged and the code in question is removed altogether).
>
Ok. Applied to hwmon-next.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists