[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170608193713.GG20216@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 21:37:13 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: provide printing macros
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:04:39PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> The mv88e6xxx driver accesses a port's netdev mostly for printing.
>
> This is bad for 2 reasons: DSA and CPU ports do not have a netdev
> pointer; it doesn't give us a correct picture of why a DSA driver might
> need to access a port's netdev.
>
> Introduce mv88e6xxx_{dbg,err,warn} macros to print messages with a
> prefix containing the real switch name (not the compatible one),
> as well as the switch and port indexes.
Hi Vivien
I agree with the principle, but wonder about the naming. We have some
stuff which is not per port, but at the chip level. It would be nice
to have a similar set of helpers, but which only take chip. So maybe
we want to call these mv88e6xxx_port_{dbg, err, warn} and later add
mv88e6xxx_chip_{dbg, err, warn}.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists