linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 46/58] clocksource/drivers: Add a new driver for the Atmel ARM TC blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170608085233.01c82788@bbrezillon>
Date:   Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:52:33 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/58] clocksource/drivers: Add a new driver for the
 Atmel ARM TC blocks

Le Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:38:10 +0200,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> a écrit :

> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:09:08PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 07/06/2017 at 16:17:35 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:  
> > > > > > This driver uses regmap and syscon to be able to probe early in the boot
> > > > > > and avoid having to switch on the TCB clocksource later. Using regmap also
> > > > > > means that unused TCB channels may be used by other drivers (PWM for
> > > > > > example).  
> > > > > 
> > > > > Can you give more details, I fail to understand how regmap and syscon help to
> > > > > probe sooner than timer_init()?  
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Because before that, the tcb driver relied on atmel_tclib to share the
> > > > TCBs and it happened way too late, at arch_initcall() time.  
> > > 
> > > So is it still necesary to use regmap? I would like to take the opportunity to
> > > move the init routine to the common init routine if possible:
> > > 
> > > 	https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9768845/
> > >   
> > 
> > It is still necessary because we want to be able to share the timer
> > between multiple drivers. For example, you can have the clocksource on
> > channel 0, clockevent on channel 1 and a pwm on channel 2  
> 
> The hardware timer can be shared, the channels used in different subsystem.
> 
> Each channel are used exclusively.

Yes, that's correct, but some registers are shared, and we need locking
to control accesses to these registers. There's one register in
particular that has to be protected against concurrent accesses:
TC_BMR. But this register is only written at init time, not in the hot
path.

> 
> What is the benefit of regmap? It has a cost, and takes a lock at each read.
> 
> For instance:
> 
> +static u64 tc_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
> +{
> +	u32		lower, upper, tmp;
> +
> +	do {
> +		regmap_read(tc.regmap, ATMEL_TC_CV(1), &upper);
> +		regmap_read(tc.regmap, ATMEL_TC_CV(0), &lower);
> +		regmap_read(tc.regmap, ATMEL_TC_CV(1), &tmp);
> +	} while (upper != tmp);
> +
> +	return (upper << 16) | lower;
> +}
> 
> Is:
> 
> +static u64 tc_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
> +{
> +	u32		lower, upper, tmp;
> +
> +	do {
> +		regmap_read(tc.regmap, ATMEL_TC_CV(1), &upper);
> 			lock();
> 			lot-of-things();
> 			unlock();
> +		regmap_read(tc.regmap, ATMEL_TC_CV(0), &lower);
> 			lock();
> 			lot-of-things();
> 			unlock();
> +		regmap_read(tc.regmap, ATMEL_TC_CV(1), &tmp);
> 			lock();
> 			lot-of-things();
> 			unlock();
> +	} while (upper != tmp);
> +
> +	return (upper << 16) | lower;
> +}
> 
> I suggest to look what is in 'lot-of-things()' and especially what is doing
> regcache_read().
> 
> May be you can reconsider the regmap? This driver is the only one use the
> regmap AFAICT and I don't think it is adequate.

Alexandre, maybe we could of_ioremap() the TCB region in this driver
and use regular readl to read TC_CV regs: those are attached to a
specific channel, so we shouldn't have concurrency issues here.