[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170608081228.GA26932@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 01:12:28 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
albert@...ive.com, patches@...ups.riscv.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] pci: Add generic pcibios_{fixup_bus,align_resource}
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 09:19:49AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> CC pci folks
Ok, replying with pci folks in Cc then :)
Weak symbols have (rightly) gotten a bad reputation, so maybe
we should approach this without them.
It seems we have a large number of emptry pcibios_fixup_bus calls
alreayd, so I think we should simply have the architectures
that do define it define a Kconfig or header symbol and not call
it at all otherwise.
For the ones that exist as lot just seem to call pci_read_bridge_bases
and/or pcibios_fixup_device_resources in one form or another,
and I wonder why we even need the arch indirection for that.
Similarly for pcibios_align_resource: a lot of architetures seem
to have a noop, and the once that don't mostly seem copy and
paste code, so we should again have a symbol for architectures
to opt into it, and we probably should have a generic helper
for the VGA window mirroring code instead of duplicating it multiple
times.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists