[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170608115430.GB29151@krava>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:54:30 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Simon Que <sque@...omium.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/15] perf header: add a buffer to struct feat_fd
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 12:07:18AM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
SNIP
> @@ -2600,7 +2661,7 @@ static int perf_file_section__process(struct perf_file_section *section,
> struct perf_header *ph,
> int feat, int fd, void *data)
> {
> - struct feat_fd fdd = {
> + struct feat_fd ff = {
> .fd = fd,
> .ph = ph,
> .size = section->size,
> @@ -2621,7 +2682,7 @@ static int perf_file_section__process(struct perf_file_section *section,
> if (!feat_ops[feat].process)
> return 0;
>
> - return feat_ops[feat].process(&fdd, data);
> + return feat_ops[feat].process(&ff, data);
> }
should be part of the previous patch that introduced this
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists