[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170608.100222.1573468093040905016.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:02:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: arnd@...db.de
Cc: babu.moger@...cle.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CPU_BIG_ENDIAN in generic code
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:01:59 +0200
> I would also suggest adding a sanity check like
Hmm, but this will kill the build for non-fixed endian architectures
won't it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists