[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170608103244.1b4b24c9@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:32:44 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, will.deacon@....com,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Remove SYNC from _switch
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 18:15:06 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Now that the scheduler's rq->lock is RCsc and thus provides full
> transitivity between scheduling actions. And since we cannot migrate
> current, a task needs a switch-out and a switch-in in order to
> migrate, in which case the RCsc provides all the ordering we need.
Hi Peter,
I'm actually just working on removing this right now too, so
good timing.
I think we can't "just" remove it, because it is required to order
MMIO on powerpc as well.
But what I have done is to comment that some other primitives are
already providing the hwsync for other, so we don't have to add
another one in _switch.
Thanks,
Nick
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -488,14 +488,6 @@ _GLOBAL(_switch)
> std r23,_CCR(r1)
> std r1,KSP(r3) /* Set old stack pointer */
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - /* We need a sync somewhere here to make sure that if the
> - * previous task gets rescheduled on another CPU, it sees all
> - * stores it has performed on this one.
> - */
> - sync
> -#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> -
> /*
> * If we optimise away the clear of the reservation in system
> * calls because we know the CPU tracks the address of the
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists