[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1x1VuNkvjkHM-e7b8pZ=A2W0iadUnSXTX=Z5cOTsV6+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:19:15 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajendra <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] media: ngene: Replace semaphore stream_mutex with mutex
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org> wrote:
> The semaphore 'stream_mutex' is used as a simple mutex, so
> it should be written as one. Semaphores are going away in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>
> ---
Looks correct, though I wonder whether it would be nicer to move the
mutex_lock/unlock() to the caller to avoid repeating the unlock() five
times.
Either way,
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists