[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170608182311.05cced9e@thinkpad>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 18:23:11 +0200
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/44] s390: implement ->mapping_error
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:25:44 +0200
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> s390 can also use noop_dma_ops, and while that currently does not return
> errors it will so in the future. Implementing the mapping_error method
> is the proper way to have per-ops error conditions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Acked-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists