[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ff6bd21-19f0-7e0c-18bf-e835e7d4319e@mentor.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:30:00 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Introduce of_node_get_match_data() helper
Hello Geert,
On 04/25/2017 08:40 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> If CONFIG_OF=n, code using
>
> info = of_match_node(matchs, np)->data;
>
> fails to compile:
>
> warning: dereferencing ‘void *’ pointer
> error: request for member ‘data’ in something not a structure or union
IMHO firstly all the cases like one above must be fixed in place, in
parallel do an overall conversion of subcases:
- of_id = of_match_node(some_dt_ids, dev->of_node);
+ of_id = of_match_device(some_dt_ids, dev);
> Follow the example set by of_device_get_match_data(), and introduce a
> new helper of_node_get_match_data(). This will allow to increase
> compile-testing coverage later.
Unfortunately the proposed of_node_get_match_data() is not so similar
to the of_device_get_match_data(), the latter one has only one input
argument in opposite to of_match_device(), which is truly convenient.
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
The change itself is good.
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists