linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: dts: exynos: Remove the OF graph from DSI node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170609073737.GC4018@kozik-book>
Date:   Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:37:37 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Hoegeun Kwon <hoegeun.kwon@...sung.com>
Cc:     inki.dae@...sung.com, jy0922.shim@...sung.com,
        sw0312.kim@...sung.com, airlied@...ux.ie, kgene@...nel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, javier@....samsung.com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, a.hajda@...sung.com,
        andi.shyti@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: dts: exynos: Remove the OF graph from DSI
 node

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 03:14:20PM +0900, Hoegeun Kwon wrote:
> On 05/19/2017 03:17 PM, Hoegeun Kwon wrote:
> >On 05/16/2017 01:48 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 01:54:11PM +0900, Hoegeun Kwon wrote:
> >>>The OF graph is not needed because the panel is a child of dsi. Remove
> >>>the ports node in DSI node.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Hoegeun Kwon <hoegeun.kwon@...sung.com>
> >>>Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
> >>>Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
> >>>---
> >>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi | 14
> >>>--------------
> >>>  1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I wanted to apply this (and 5/5) but it seems that DRM change is not
> >>merged. Was it included in v4.12-rc1?
> >>
> >>Best regards,
> >>Krzysztof
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >Sorry for my belated reply.
> >
> >The DRM patch(3/5) is not merged in v4.12-rc1 (mainline)...
> >I have checked the David's branch, but not merged.
> >However it was merged into Inki's exynos drm branch.
> >
> >Inki, Could you check the patch(3/5).
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Hoegeun
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> The drm patch(3/5) has been merged into v4.12-rc4.

Thanks for letting me know. My branch is rebased on v4.12-rc1 so to
maintain bisectabiltiy I would have to merge v4.12-rc4... thus making a
messy history.

It is just a cleanup so I will take it after releasing v4.12, so this
will end up in v4.14. No need to resend, I'll keep it in Patchwork.

Best regards,
Krzysztof