[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170609132547.42891867@luca>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 13:25:47 +0200
From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][-next] sched/deadline: make new function grub_reclaim
static
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 12:08:51 +0100
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Make function grub_reclaim static to clean up the following sparse
> warning:
>
> "warning: symbol 'grub_reclaim' was not declared. Should it be static?"
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index e12f85975857..2ddb4e6d820f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ extern bool sched_rt_bandwidth_account(struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
> * should be larger than 2^(64 - 20 - 8), which is more than 64 seconds.
> * So, overflow is not an issue here.
> */
> -u64 grub_reclaim(u64 delta, struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
> +static u64 grub_reclaim(u64 delta, struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
> {
> u64 u_inact = rq->dl.this_bw - rq->dl.running_bw; /* Utot - Uact */
> u64 u_act;
Looks good; thanks for fixing this (and sorry for introducing the
warning).
Acked-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
Luca
Powered by blists - more mailing lists