linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to ref cycles on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170611184451.GC28361@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Sun, 11 Jun 2017 11:44:51 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     kan.liang@...el.com, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        peterz@...radead.org, vincent.weaver@...ne.edu, eranian@...gle.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to
 ref cycles on x86

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:39:59PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>    Not commenting on the patch itself - I'll leave that to others. But the
>    sign-off chain is buggered.
>    When you re-send these patches that got reverted earlier, you really
>    should add yourself to the sign-off list.. and if you were the original
>    author, you should have been there from the first...
>    Hmm?

I was the original author, but this got lost somewhere.

-Andi