linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/11] Creation of "check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1dccd8da-c96f-3947-d90f-a3f3d4f389fd@schaufler-ca.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2017 14:31:48 -0700
From:   Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:     Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
        Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
        PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] Creation of "check_vmflags" LSM hook

On 6/12/2017 9:56 AM, Salvatore Mesoraca wrote:
> Creation of a new LSM hook to check if a given configuration of vmflags,
> for a new memory allocation request, should be allowed or not.
> It's placed in "do_mmap", "do_brk_flags" and "__install_special_mapping".
>
> Signed-off-by: Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> ---
>  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 6 ++++++
>  include/linux/security.h  | 6 ++++++
>  mm/mmap.c                 | 9 +++++++++
>  security/security.c       | 5 +++++
>  4 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index cc0937e..6934cc5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -483,6 +483,10 @@
>   *	@reqprot contains the protection requested by the application.
>   *	@prot contains the protection that will be applied by the kernel.
>   *	Return 0 if permission is granted.
> + * @check_vmflags:
> + *	Check if the requested @vmflags are allowed.
> + *	@vmflags contains requested the vmflags.
> + *	Return 0 if the operation is allowed to continue.
>   * @file_lock:
>   *	Check permission before performing file locking operations.
>   *	Note: this hook mediates both flock and fcntl style locks.
> @@ -1482,6 +1486,7 @@
>  				unsigned long prot, unsigned long flags);
>  	int (*file_mprotect)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long reqprot,
>  				unsigned long prot);
> +	int (*check_vmflags)(vm_flags_t vmflags);
>  	int (*file_lock)(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd);
>  	int (*file_fcntl)(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  				unsigned long arg);
> @@ -1753,6 +1758,7 @@ struct security_hook_heads {
>  	struct list_head mmap_addr;
>  	struct list_head mmap_file;
>  	struct list_head file_mprotect;
> +	struct list_head check_vmflags;
>  	struct list_head file_lock;
>  	struct list_head file_fcntl;
>  	struct list_head file_set_fowner;
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index 19bc364..67e33b6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ int security_mmap_file(struct file *file, unsigned long prot,
>  int security_mmap_addr(unsigned long addr);
>  int security_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long reqprot,
>  			   unsigned long prot);
> +int security_check_vmflags(vm_flags_t vmflags);
>  int security_file_lock(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd);
>  int security_file_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);
>  void security_file_set_fowner(struct file *file);
> @@ -830,6 +831,11 @@ static inline int security_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int security_check_vmflags(vm_flags_t vmflags)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int security_file_lock(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index f82741e..e19f04e 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -1363,6 +1363,9 @@ unsigned long do_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
>  	vm_flags |= calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey) | calc_vm_flag_bits(flags) |
>  			mm->def_flags | VM_MAYREAD | VM_MAYWRITE | VM_MAYEXEC;
>  
> +	if (security_check_vmflags(vm_flags))
> +		return -EPERM;
> +

Have the hook return a value and return that rather
than -EPERM. That way a security module can choose an
error that it determines is appropriate. It is possible
that a module might want to deny the access for a reason
other than lack of privilege. 

>  	if (flags & MAP_LOCKED)
>  		if (!can_do_mlock())
>  			return -EPERM;
> @@ -2833,6 +2836,9 @@ static int do_brk_flags(unsigned long addr, unsigned long request, unsigned long
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	flags |= VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS | VM_ACCOUNT | mm->def_flags;
>  
> +	if (security_check_vmflags(flags))
> +		return -EPERM;
> +

Same here

>  	error = get_unmapped_area(NULL, addr, len, 0, MAP_FIXED);
>  	if (offset_in_page(error))
>  		return error;
> @@ -3208,6 +3214,9 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *__install_special_mapping(
>  	int ret;
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>  
> +	if (security_check_vmflags(vm_flags))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
> +

And here.

>  	vma = kmem_cache_zalloc(vm_area_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (unlikely(vma == NULL))
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index e390f99..25d58f0 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -905,6 +905,11 @@ int security_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long reqprot,
>  	return call_int_hook(file_mprotect, 0, vma, reqprot, prot);
>  }
>  
> +int security_check_vmflags(vm_flags_t vmflags)
> +{
> +	return call_int_hook(check_vmflags, 0, vmflags);
> +}
> +
>  int security_file_lock(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd)
>  {
>  	return call_int_hook(file_lock, 0, file, cmd);