linux-kernel - Re: Hang/soft lockup in d_invalidate with simultaneous calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACGdZYLNWyr3j4so-G3gv7V+NHtQ31p4pF_OMe1uYMgaqu4RsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2017 16:00:45 -0700
From:   Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Hang/soft lockup in d_invalidate with simultaneous calls

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> The thing is, unlike shrink_dcache_parent() we *can* bugger off as
>> soon as we'd found no victims, nothing mounted and dentry itself
>> is unhashed.  We can't do anything in select_collect() (we would've
>> broken shrink_dcache_parent() that way), but we can do unhashing
>> in check_and_drop() in "really nothing to do" case and we can return
>> from d_invalidate() after that.  So how about this:
> That does the trick.

I'm not entirely familiar the process here, is the above change
committed somewhere, should I propose a patch?

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4843 bytes)