[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170612095839.GA32404@verge.net.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:58:39 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marcus Cooper <codekipper@...il.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the renesas
tree
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:46:27AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > d795f15618b8 ("of: Add vendor prefix for iWave Systems Technologies Pvt. Ltd")
> >
> > from the renesas tree and commit:
> >
> > 97a0268e764c ("devicetree: add Itead vendor prefix")
> >
> > from the devicetree tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
>
> Simon, I can pick up the conflicting patch if you want to drop it.
Thanks, I will drop it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists