lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 15:25:25 +0200 From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/58] clocksource/drivers: Add a new driver for the Atmel ARM TC blocks On 12/06/2017 14:54, Nicolas Ferre wrote: [ ... ] >> I like the 'chosen' approach with the nodes you are proposing below. Thanks for >> the constructive suggestion. The binding description matches perfectly what we >> are trying to achieve. >> >> Rob? what do you think? > > I'm following this work from a distance but as we've just celebrated the > 1st anniversary for this patch series (11 June 2016), I propose that we > now make up our mind quickly. Everybody seem to be on the same page and > willing to make this rework move forward. > > In Microchip/Atmel we would like to actually use this TCB rework both > internally and in our mainline work to avoid having to rely on our own > out-of-tree implementation. > > The newly-added samv7 cortex-M can't boot without this series and a use > of our current cortex-A SoCs with TrustZone in Secure World (SWd) is not > possible with current mainline code only. On these two examples, the > current timer on which we rely, the PIT, is not present. > > So you probably understand that more than one year without real progress > begins to be a little bit frustrating for the AT91 users... Nicolas, who are you exactly blaming? Are you surprised a 58 patches series, with a gazillion of Cc'ed people posted awhile ago, is ignored? -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists