linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.11 069/150] mtd: nand: tango: Update ecc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170612152522.368560407@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:24:36 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.11 069/150] mtd: nand: tango: Update ecc_stats.corrected

4.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>

commit 60cf0ce14b09b54e7ee79dc3ef498de6ef0e41e9 upstream.

According to Boris, some user-space tools expect MTD drivers to
update ecc_stats.corrected, and it's better to provide a lower
bound than to provide no information at all.

Fixes: 6956e2385a16 ("mtd: nand: add tango NAND flash controller support")
Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/mtd/nand/tango_nand.c |   22 +++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/tango_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/tango_nand.c
@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@
  * byte 1 for other packets in the page (PKT_N, for N > 0)
  * ERR_COUNT_PKT_N is the max error count over all but the first packet.
  */
-#define DECODE_OK_PKT_0(v)	((v) & BIT(7))
-#define DECODE_OK_PKT_N(v)	((v) & BIT(15))
 #define ERR_COUNT_PKT_0(v)	(((v) >> 0) & 0x3f)
 #define ERR_COUNT_PKT_N(v)	(((v) >> 8) & 0x3f)
+#define DECODE_FAIL_PKT_0(v)	(((v) & BIT(7)) == 0)
+#define DECODE_FAIL_PKT_N(v)	(((v) & BIT(15)) == 0)
 
 /* Offsets relative to pbus_base */
 #define PBUS_CS_CTRL	0x83c
@@ -193,6 +193,8 @@ static int check_erased_page(struct nand
 						  chip->ecc.strength);
 		if (res < 0)
 			mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
+		else
+			mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += res;
 
 		bitflips = max(res, bitflips);
 		buf += pkt_size;
@@ -202,9 +204,11 @@ static int check_erased_page(struct nand
 	return bitflips;
 }
 
-static int decode_error_report(struct tango_nfc *nfc)
+static int decode_error_report(struct nand_chip *chip)
 {
 	u32 status, res;
+	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
+	struct tango_nfc *nfc = to_tango_nfc(chip->controller);
 
 	status = readl_relaxed(nfc->reg_base + NFC_XFER_STATUS);
 	if (status & PAGE_IS_EMPTY)
@@ -212,10 +216,14 @@ static int decode_error_report(struct ta
 
 	res = readl_relaxed(nfc->mem_base + ERROR_REPORT);
 
-	if (DECODE_OK_PKT_0(res) && DECODE_OK_PKT_N(res))
-		return max(ERR_COUNT_PKT_0(res), ERR_COUNT_PKT_N(res));
+	if (DECODE_FAIL_PKT_0(res) || DECODE_FAIL_PKT_N(res))
+		return -EBADMSG;
+
+	/* ERR_COUNT_PKT_N is max, not sum, but that's all we have */
+	mtd->ecc_stats.corrected +=
+		ERR_COUNT_PKT_0(res) + ERR_COUNT_PKT_N(res);
 
-	return -EBADMSG;
+	return max(ERR_COUNT_PKT_0(res), ERR_COUNT_PKT_N(res));
 }
 
 static void tango_dma_callback(void *arg)
@@ -280,7 +288,7 @@ static int tango_read_page(struct mtd_in
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	res = decode_error_report(nfc);
+	res = decode_error_report(chip);
 	if (res < 0) {
 		chip->ecc.read_oob_raw(mtd, chip, page);
 		res = check_erased_page(chip, buf);