[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170612152556.943935493@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:24:28 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>, Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 006/119] vxlan: fix use-after-free on deletion
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>
[ Upstream commit a53cb29b0af346af44e4abf13d7e59f807fba690 ]
Adding a vxlan interface to a socket isn't symmetrical, while adding
is done in vxlan_open() the deletion is done in vxlan_dellink().
This can cause a use-after-free error when we close the vxlan
interface before deleting it.
We add vxlan_vs_del_dev() to match vxlan_vs_add_dev() and call
it from vxlan_stop() to match the call from vxlan_open().
Fixes: 56ef9c909b40 ("vxlan: Move socket initialization to within rtnl scope")
Acked-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>
Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ static const u8 all_zeros_mac[ETH_ALEN +
static int vxlan_sock_add(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan);
+static void vxlan_vs_del_dev(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan);
+
/* per-network namespace private data for this module */
struct vxlan_net {
struct list_head vxlan_list;
@@ -1040,6 +1042,8 @@ static void vxlan_sock_release(struct vx
rcu_assign_pointer(vxlan->vn4_sock, NULL);
synchronize_net();
+ vxlan_vs_del_dev(vxlan);
+
if (__vxlan_sock_release_prep(sock4)) {
udp_tunnel_sock_release(sock4->sock);
kfree(sock4);
@@ -2300,6 +2304,15 @@ static void vxlan_cleanup(unsigned long
mod_timer(&vxlan->age_timer, next_timer);
}
+static void vxlan_vs_del_dev(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan)
+{
+ struct vxlan_net *vn = net_generic(vxlan->net, vxlan_net_id);
+
+ spin_lock(&vn->sock_lock);
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&vxlan->hlist);
+ spin_unlock(&vn->sock_lock);
+}
+
static void vxlan_vs_add_dev(struct vxlan_sock *vs, struct vxlan_dev *vxlan)
{
struct vxlan_net *vn = net_generic(vxlan->net, vxlan_net_id);
@@ -3070,12 +3083,6 @@ static int vxlan_newlink(struct net *src
static void vxlan_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
{
struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
- struct vxlan_net *vn = net_generic(vxlan->net, vxlan_net_id);
-
- spin_lock(&vn->sock_lock);
- if (!hlist_unhashed(&vxlan->hlist))
- hlist_del_rcu(&vxlan->hlist);
- spin_unlock(&vn->sock_lock);
gro_cells_destroy(&vxlan->gro_cells);
list_del(&vxlan->next);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists