linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 117/119] cpufreq: schedutil: move cached_raw_freq to struct sugov

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170612152604.499414764@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:26:19 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 117/119] cpufreq: schedutil: move cached_raw_freq to struct sugov_policy

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

commit 6c4f0fa643cb9e775dcc976e3db00d649468ff1d upstream.

cached_raw_freq applies to the entire cpufreq policy and not individual
CPUs. Apart from wasting per-cpu memory, it is actually wrong to keep it
in struct sugov_cpu as we may end up comparing next_freq with a stale
cached_raw_freq of a random CPU.

Move cached_raw_freq to struct sugov_policy.

Fixes: 5cbea46984d6 (cpufreq: schedutil: map raw required frequency to driver frequency)
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct sugov_policy {
 	u64 last_freq_update_time;
 	s64 freq_update_delay_ns;
 	unsigned int next_freq;
+	unsigned int cached_raw_freq;
 
 	/* The next fields are only needed if fast switch cannot be used. */
 	struct irq_work irq_work;
@@ -46,7 +47,6 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
 	struct update_util_data update_util;
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy;
 
-	unsigned int cached_raw_freq;
 	unsigned long iowait_boost;
 	unsigned long iowait_boost_max;
 	u64 last_update;
@@ -140,9 +140,9 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct
 
 	freq = (freq + (freq >> 2)) * util / max;
 
-	if (freq == sg_cpu->cached_raw_freq && sg_policy->next_freq != UINT_MAX)
+	if (freq == sg_policy->cached_raw_freq && sg_policy->next_freq != UINT_MAX)
 		return sg_policy->next_freq;
-	sg_cpu->cached_raw_freq = freq;
+	sg_policy->cached_raw_freq = freq;
 	return cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(policy, freq);
 }
 
@@ -502,6 +502,7 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_po
 	sg_policy->next_freq = UINT_MAX;
 	sg_policy->work_in_progress = false;
 	sg_policy->need_freq_update = false;
+	sg_policy->cached_raw_freq = 0;
 
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) {
 		struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, cpu);
@@ -512,7 +513,6 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_po
 			sg_cpu->max = 0;
 			sg_cpu->flags = SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT;
 			sg_cpu->last_update = 0;
-			sg_cpu->cached_raw_freq = 0;
 			sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
 			sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
 			cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(cpu, &sg_cpu->update_util,