[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLXz_HRev1A4PE+_51QZof-27aXptxM3+=odYcnhQdpsyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:54:33 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftests: timers: Fix inconsistency-check to not ignore
first timestamp
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com> wrote:
> When the first timestamp in the list of clock readings was later than
> the second timestamp and all other timestamps were in order, the
> inconsistency was not reported because the index of the out-of-order
> timestamp was equal to the default value.
>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Queued up in my tree for testing, targeting 4.13.
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists