[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170613060214.GG5297@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:32:14 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Tomasz Wilczynski <twilczynski@...er.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: conservative: Allow down_threshold to take
values from 1 to 10
On 13-06-17, 14:58, Tomasz Wilczynski wrote:
> This is my first patch so please bare with me...
No worries, we were just telling you about what's the right way..
> I am just a little
> confused. Does this mean that it is all right to leave the patch as it is,
> or should I still add the Fixes: tag and resubmit it?
Rafael has already applied the patch with all the required tags (look
in the PM tree):
commit b8e11f7d2791bd9320be1c6e772a60b2aa093e45
Author: Tomasz Wilczyński <twilczynski@...er.com>
Date: Sun Jun 11 17:28:39 2017 +0900
cpufreq: conservative: Allow down_threshold to take values from 1 to 10
Commit 27ed3cd2ebf4 (cpufreq: conservative: Fix the logic in frequency
decrease checking) removed the 10 point substraction when comparing the
load against down_threshold but did not remove the related limit for the
down_threshold value. As a result, down_threshold lower than 11 is not
allowed even though values from 1 to 10 do work correctly too. The
comment ("cannot be lower than 11 otherwise freq will not fall") also
does not apply after removing the substraction.
For this reason, allow down_threshold to take any value from 1 to 99
and fix the related comment.
Fixes: 27ed3cd2ebf4 (cpufreq: conservative: Fix the logic in frequency decrease checking)
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Wilczyński <twilczynski@...er.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: 3.10+ <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.10+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists