linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the s390 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170613162827.3db67f6b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:28:27 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the s390 tree

Hi Christoph,

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 08:20:55 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> Btw, scm_blk.c blk-mq conversion seems odd if not broken.  It should
> always call blk_mq_complete_request from scm_request_finish and
> then pass the error to blk_mq_end_request frin
> there.
> 
> It would be great if such major block driver changes were Cc'ed to
> linux-block.

And I missed cc'ing the s390 guys with my report :-(

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell