[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170613063924.j5kmyrkmpsaykfsg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 08:39:24 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Stephen Hines <srhines@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bernhard.Rosenkranzer@...aro.org,
Peter Foley <pefoley2@...oley.com>,
Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: stack alignment for boot code and clang
* Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> This series fixes an issue with the stack of the x86 boot code not
> being aligned as intended. Further it adapts the Makefile to account
> for the fact that clang uses a different option to configure the
> stack alignment than gcc (-mstack-alignment=N vs
> -mpreferred-stack-boundary=N)
>
> Matthias Kaehlcke (3):
> kbuild: Add cc-option-no-kbuild macro
> x86/build: Use cc-option-no-kbuild for boot code compiler options
> x86/build: Specify stack alignment for clang
>
> arch/x86/Makefile | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> scripts/Kbuild.include | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Looks good to me, modulo the minor comments I just made to the #3 patch.
This needs acks from the kbuild people before I can apply the fixes.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists