[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62e395b4-b4af-34d8-134a-222984ebe779@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 09:49:16 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xen.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/18] xen/pvcalls: disconnect and module_exit
On 02/06/17 21:31, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Implement backend_disconnect. Call pvcalls_back_release_active on active
> sockets and pvcalls_back_release_passive on passive sockets.
>
> Implement module_exit by calling backend_disconnect on frontend
> connections.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
> CC: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
> CC: jgross@...e.com
> ---
> drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> index b541887..6afe7a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> @@ -800,6 +800,38 @@ static int backend_connect(struct xenbus_device *dev)
>
> static int backend_disconnect(struct xenbus_device *dev)
> {
> + struct pvcalls_fedata *priv;
> + struct sock_mapping *map, *n;
> + struct sockpass_mapping *mappass;
> + struct radix_tree_iter iter;
> + void **slot;
> +
> +
> + priv = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(map, n, &priv->socket_mappings, list) {
> + pvcalls_back_release_active(dev, priv, map);
> + }
You can drop the {}
> +
> + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &priv->socketpass_mappings, &iter, 0) {
> + mappass = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot);
> + if (!mappass || radix_tree_exception(mappass)) {
This looks fishy.
You might call radix_tree_deref_retry(NULL). Right now this is okay,
but you depend on the radix tree internals here.
> + if (radix_tree_deref_retry(mappass)) {
> + slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter);
> + continue;
The continue; statement is pointless here.
> + }
> + } else
> + pvcalls_back_release_passive(dev, priv, mappass);
> + }
> +
> + xenbus_unmap_ring_vfree(dev, (void *)priv->sring);
Drop the cast.
> + unbind_from_irqhandler(priv->irq, dev);
> +
> + list_del(&priv->list);
> + destroy_workqueue(priv->wq);
> + kfree(priv);
> + dev_set_drvdata(&dev->dev, NULL);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -993,3 +1025,20 @@ static int __init pvcalls_back_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
> module_init(pvcalls_back_init);
> +
> +static void __exit pvcalls_back_fin(void)
> +{
> + struct pvcalls_fedata *priv, *npriv;
> +
> + down(&pvcalls_back_global.frontends_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(priv, npriv, &pvcalls_back_global.frontends,
> + list) {
> + backend_disconnect(priv->dev);
> + }
> + up(&pvcalls_back_global.frontends_lock);
> +
> + xenbus_unregister_driver(&pvcalls_back_driver);
> + memset(&pvcalls_back_global, 0, sizeof(pvcalls_back_global));
Why?
Juergen
> +}
> +
> +module_exit(pvcalls_back_fin);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists