[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170613090039.14393-5-mhocko@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:00:39 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/4] mm, hugetlb, soft_offline: use new_page_nodemask for soft offline migration
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
new_page is yet another duplication of the migration callback which has
to handle hugetlb migration specially. We can safely use the generic
new_page_nodemask for the same purpose.
Please note that gigantic hugetlb pages do not need any special handling
because alloc_huge_page_nodemask will make sure to check pages in all
per node pools. The reason this was done previously was that
alloc_huge_page_node treated NO_NUMA_NODE and a specific node
differently and so alloc_huge_page_node(nid) would check on this
specific node.
Noticed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 3615bffbd269..7040f60ecb71 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1487,16 +1487,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unpoison_memory);
static struct page *new_page(struct page *p, unsigned long private, int **x)
{
int nid = page_to_nid(p);
- if (PageHuge(p)) {
- struct hstate *hstate = page_hstate(compound_head(p));
- if (hstate_is_gigantic(hstate))
- return alloc_huge_page_node(hstate, NUMA_NO_NODE);
-
- return alloc_huge_page_node(hstate, nid);
- } else {
- return __alloc_pages_node(nid, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, 0);
- }
+ return new_page_nodemask(p, nid, &node_states[N_MEMORY]);
}
/*
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists