linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/9] tty: ircomm: remove dead and broken ioctl code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170613100054.GK10775@localhost>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:00:54 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Samuel Ortiz <samuel@...tiz.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] tty: ircomm: remove dead and broken ioctl code

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:57:14AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:48:41AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 12:27:04PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > On Tue,  6 Jun 2017 12:54:40 +0200
> > > Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Remove three ifdefed and broken implementations of TIOCSSERIAL and
> > > > TIOCGICOUNT, and parity handling in set_termios which had suffered
> > > > severe bit rot.
> > > 
> > > I would be amazed if the IRDA code still works. It's not been tested
> > > properly for years and it never followed the tty rules properly in the
> > > first place - so this looks good, although moving IRDA into staging
> > > and /dev/null would IMHO be far better.
> > > 
> > > IRDA is dead, and IR remotes are handled via completely different code.
> > 
> > I agree, and we should move it into staging and out of the tree, I'll
> > send netdev some patches for that...
> 
> Sounds good, but please consider applying this patch before moving to
> staging as people have been modifying this dead code as part of
> kernel-wide updates even though hasn't even compiled for quite some
> time.

That is, just that which you ended up doing. :)

Thanks,
Johan