[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHv-k_9zTAjiubsjmbRfpMRTSxv214452+xXyw5A3RFZKbQFpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:39:28 +0530
From: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajendra <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...glemail.com>,
Andrew de los Reyes <adlr@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: Replace semaphore driver_lock with mutex
Hi,
On 13 June 2017 at 15:26, Benjamin Tissoires
<benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Looks good to me, but I see you didn't include David and Andrew on
>> Cc, it would be good for at least one of them to provide an Ack as well.
>
> Please also CC linux-input@
Will do that.
> (one more nitpick below too)
> A little bit below, there is:
> bool io_started; /* Protected by driver_lock. If IO has started */
>
> You should probably remove the mention to driver_lock here.
Will remove the reference too.
>> > - struct semaphore driver_lock; /* protects the current driver, except during input */
>> > + struct mutex driver_lock; /* protects the current driver, except during input */
>> > struct semaphore driver_input_lock; /* protects the current driver */
>
> Unless I am mistaken, this one could also be converted to a mutex (in a
> separate patch, of course).
Thank you for noticing that, initially I missed it as I thought
'io_started' somehow
influences the increment of the semaphore, but its anyway used only in
hid-core.c
Thanks,
Binoy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists