[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tw3kgph0.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 20:18:51 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"AKASHI\, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Appended signatures support for IMA appraisal
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> writes:
>
>> Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>>> On the OpenPOWER platform, secure boot and trusted boot are being
>>> implemented using IMA for taking measurements and verifying signatures.
>>
>> I still want you to implement arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig() as well :)
>
> Yes, I will implement it! We are still working on loading the public
> keys for kernel signing from the firmware into a kernel keyring, so
> there's not much point in implementing arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
> without having that first.
OK. What's the ETA on those patches?
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists