[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1497350172.18751.11.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 03:36:12 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Srikanth Jampala <Jampala.Srikanth@...ium.com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake
"Revsion" -> "Revision"
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:52 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in seq_printf message
Hey Colin.
Fixing spelling typos is a good thing, but is it a
good thing to change possibly API dependent output
in seq_ calls?
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c b/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c
[]
> @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int nitrox_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> struct nitrox_device *ndev = s->private;
>
> seq_printf(s, "NITROX-5 [idx: %d]\n", ndev->idx);
> - seq_printf(s, " Revsion ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
> + seq_printf(s, " Revision ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
> seq_printf(s, " Cores [AE: %u SE: %u]\n",
> ndev->hw.ae_cores, ndev->hw.se_cores);
> seq_printf(s, " Number of Queues: %u\n", ndev->nr_queues);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists